The Daily Click ::. Forums ::. Daily Click ::. Voting system
 

Post Reply  Post Oekaki 
 

Posted By Message

Fifth

Quadruped

Registered
  07/05/2003
Points
  5815

VIP MemberGOTW JULY 2010 WINNER!Kliktober Special Award TagGOTW HALLOWEEN 2011 WINNERPicture Me This Round 51 Winner!
4th June, 2007 at 12:29:44 -

Well, you could keep the reviews, but have them worth a bit more than a comment-vote in the game's overall rating, or something.

I dunno if it'd be considered fair, but then taking the time to write a review would make your opinion of the game worth a bit more...

 
Go Moon!

Deleted User
4th June, 2007 at 12:35:30 -

You could convert the current thumb ratings to 10 or 0 votes for a start, that way everything wouldn't be unrated.

 

Clubsoft

Administrator
Weeeeeeee

Registered
  02/12/2001
Points
  253

Acoders MemberHas Donated, Thank You!May contain nutsVIP Member360 OwnerI'm an alien!Code Monkey
6th June, 2007 at 09:33:53 -

I can convert the thumbs into ratings, its just very hard to have an accurate top rated games list:

Heres the problem;

You have a game that gets 200 ratings, 5 negative and 195 positive (97.5%)
You have a second game that has 0 negative and 10 positive.. (100%)

With the old/current system, the game with 195 positive ratings would receive title of best game...

However, using a system such as 10/10, with the scores acculimated above, the game with 5 positive ratings would win ahead of the game with 195 as it has 100% positive (10/10) over 97.5% positive (9.75/10), which is a little unfair since it has so few votes.

Someway to combat this would be a minimum vote number before its ranked in there, but its still a little bit of a pain

Another problem is how to convert thumbs into ratings, one way is to average out the thumbs, eg.. if a game had 4 negative and 6 positive, it'd be 6/10 or 60% average, and then have 10 votes of a rating of 6/10, probably the best way to do it without loosing all the data

Idealy itd be best to start from scratch but I'd really not want to loose all the ratings we already have

Image Edited by an Administrator.

 
.: ImageApocalyptic Coders - www.acoders.com :.

Joe.H

Evil Faker

Registered
  19/08/2002
Points
  3305
6th June, 2007 at 12:05:05 -

Could you not just convert the top 100 games of each year or something? (or those with more than 50 votes)
it would save a lot of time, as those with less than 50 ratings haven't really had enough votes (unless all of them are positive, which I doubt)

 
My signature is never too big!!!

AndyUK

Mascot Maniac

Registered
  01/08/2002
Points
  14586

Game of the Week WinnerSecond GOTW AwardHas Donated, Thank You!VIP Member
6th June, 2007 at 20:03:10 -

I bet there is a very large proportion of dead links in the downloads section.
So converting every score might not be so vital.

Although i guess there would still be a large amount of games with no ratings.

 
.

Liquixcat

Administrator
Lazy Coder

Registered
  08/12/2002
Points
  201

VIP MemberLikes TDCKitty
6th June, 2007 at 23:49:40 -

This sounds like a much better system. The thumbs work fine, Club has a good point about it. The problem isn't the thumbs, but the insincerity of voting. Giving a reason for your vote is so much better.

It'd also be nice to make a cookie (or something) to say if they can comment or not. When they click download, then they can comment. When they comment they vote. People commenting without downloading is retarded. Only Admins should comment on "more info please". I can't think of any reason to comment without first downloading.

Image Edited by the Author.

 
thinking is like pong, it's easy, but you miss sometimes.
   

Post Reply



 



Advertisement

Worth A Click