The Daily Click ::. Links
 

PG
Author: Fanotherpg Submitted: 11 2006
Hits: 1207  

It's my team home page. Page is very simple and plain because we don't like awesome graphics like on http://rst.phpnet.us (team which I'm member). Actually we work over 3 cRPGs (CT:FW, DS:FW, S2:SotSS) and MKWS. More information on page. Please comment.

Visit This Site: http://balon.ovh.org

Posted by Tim May 11 2006

It's ok... it COULD do with some kinda nice template - but oh well. You might want to correct a few bits of English so it makes a little more sense in areas
 
Posted by axel June 11 2006

Yeah, it looks a bit harsh
 
Posted by DaVince June 11 2006

lol, all this extra effort thanks to tables. Use divs and CSS, it's much easier and can give the same result!

The colour scheme could use some finetuning, but the design isn't bad.
 
Posted by Fanotherpg June 11 2006

English isn't my first language and I'm still learning it and it looks like we learn times etc. and not practical use.. So if you can help with this grammar mistakes.. And I don't like div and css because always when I write them they don't work under e.g. Mozilla.. and tables always work.. And now to add new page I must just change text...
 
Posted by DaVince June 11 2006

"because always when I write them they don't work under e.g. Mozilla.."

Bullshit. I made a fully functional and good-looking site with divs and CSS only.
http://www.spheredev.org/~dnaproduct/

Besides, W3 states that tables are deprecated and you should use styles instead.
 
Posted by Fanotherpg July 11 2006

Yea yea I know but always when I write Divs and CSS they only works under IE
 
Posted by axel July 11 2006

Valid markup is the key.

http://validator.w3.org/
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
 
Posted by DaVince July 11 2006

Oh yeah, and a verb after a plural noun is always plural, too. It works, but they work.
 
Posted by Tim October 11 2006

I disagree with you saying that CSS and HTML is easier than writing straight into tables.

And it'll take at least 4+ years before tables depreciate and xhtml takes over
 
Posted by DaVince November 11 2006

Of course! Defining table then table row then table cell then next table cell then next table row and two more table cells, then closing down the table is WAY easier than making two short pieces of CSS and 4 div's.
 
Posted by Fanotherpg  11 2006

If you don't know how to write fast tables it would be such hard work like you say DaVince But it isn't so hard when you've got a lay which you make in few minutes and you don't have change divs for each new page...
 
Posted by DaVince  11 2006

Okay, but myself, I prefer divs over tables for layout and tables over divs for, well, tables.
 

 



Author Info

Advertisement

Worth A Click