Anyone played this yet? I heard from some reviews that the FPS bits control better than Red Steel, funnily enough. Looks like it'll be more charming than Rayman 3, which I didn't find too endearing.
"Omg. Where did they get the idea to not use army guys? Are they taking drugs?" --Tim Schafer on originality in videogames
Not supporting 480p is pure laziness and ignorance. The game has to render in 480p anyway before output because:
1. blending lines to prevent flickering lines. some ps2 games doesn't do this, and that makes them appear very jaggy.
2. rendering natively in interlace requires timing to be spot on. Mix up the field order and you'll get very unpleasant artifacts!
- Ok, you must admit that was the most creative cussing this site have ever seen -
Not supporting 480p is pure laziness and ignorance.
There is no doubt a legitimate reason. Large developers do not do anything just for the sake of it. You're an idiot.
There is no doubt a legitimate reason. Large developers do not do anything just for the sake of it. You're an idiot.
Yes, laziness and ignorance, or perhaps they expect people to double dip on it? First buy the Wii version, then the graphically superior 360 or PS3 version?
I can mention several cases when 480p without reason is lacking from PAL releases of video games, WHILE PRESENT IN NTSC VERSIONS. Soul Calibur 3 for example.
Phredreeke, are you going to try and turn every topic about a new game into an 'anti whatever it is you don't like fest'?
You found out about my hidden plan. Now I'll have to kill you
how would not supporting 480p be ignorant anyway?
Because you're not making the most of the console. Sure, it won't make a difference on your tv now, but we are entering the HD age.
- Ok, you must admit that was the most creative cussing this site have ever seen -
Advertisement
Post Reply
Edited by the Author.
You found out about my hidden plan. Now I'll have to kill you 
