funnily enough no im not. and my argument was initially aimed at brandonC not you. but you looked like some fun so i said what the hell
@oldmanclayton - i never said they were the same. i actually said exactly what you said in fewer words.... *scratches head*
n/a
Dustin Gunn Gnarly Tubular Way Cool Awesome Groovy Mondo
Registered 15/12/2004
Points 2659
6th November, 2008 at 00:30:33 -
Originally Posted by Wiiman Well uh... People are falling for Obama because he's charismatic, in the same way that Hitler was charismatic. We really know nothing about the guy, besides he used to have a drug addiction and resides in Chicago. Sure McCain is like Bush, but Bush was only a bad WAR TIME president. He would have been great for peace time. The war is almost over so McCain should be fine. Plus he has lots of heart trouble and such, so Palin is most likely going to end up president if McCain is elected, besides the fact it would be cool to have an attractive president, I support Palin because she has not been in jerk off washington very much. So Palin will support the small guy more than anyone I beleive.
Hmm, Obama is charismatic, Hitler was charismatic!
OMG GUYS, Obama wrote a book, HITLER WROTE A BOOK!
Oh ok. I guess I needed to be arguing with codemonkey then.
Anyway, I would more say that Religion "believes" while Science "knows(to the best of our scientific ability)". But I guess it depends on what aspect your talking about.
Originally Posted by JustinC Oh ok. I guess I needed to be arguing with codemonkey then.
Anyway, I would more say that Religion "believes" while Science "knows(to the best of our scientific ability)". But I guess it depends on what aspect your talking about.
Actually, it's inaccurate to say that science "knows", because it really doesn't. It just assumes based off of evidence and tends to come out right, because it bases things off of realistic logic. Religion takes more of a blind leap and explains a lot more in doing so, but because of doing just that, it's results tend to be illogical and highly inaccurate. Both have there strengths and weaknesses, and both have a place in this world. However science I think, because of it's willingness to often attempt to find truth rather then hope for it, would be better suited for a large group of people who tend to all have different large scale beliefs.
well either way, you cant say how the universe was really created. neither can reproduce or collect evidence enough to support a valid claim. they are all far fetched.
Advertisement
Post Reply
We really know nothing about the guy, besides he used to have a drug addiction and resides in Chicago. Sure McCain is like Bush, but Bush was only a bad WAR TIME president. He would have been great for peace time. The war is almost over so McCain should be fine. Plus he has lots of heart trouble and such, so Palin is most likely going to end up president if McCain is elected, besides the fact it would be cool to have an attractive president, I support Palin because she has not been in jerk off washington very much. So Palin will support the small guy more than anyone I beleive.
I know. I was saying that you beat me to the punch. 
