The Daily Click ::. Forums ::. Digital Works ::. Different style of graphical work
 

Post Reply  Post Oekaki 
 

Posted By Message

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
28th August, 2012 at 28/08/2012 22:35:13 -

No the speed isn't going to be an issue. I'll figure something out. Just pointing out that you shouldn't see weapons and items from too far, is something i didn't think of. Thanks

Anyhow.. I am going to release the sandbox beta as soon as i find the bug that just came up. The bug shuts the application. Also i have some ideas to polish the sandbox beta a little, and i can not have those ball looking trees in the published sb.

But, here is a railway oil carriages that i just made function today:


Heavily guarded beach house behind those oil carriages..

Image


Decided to blast the obstacle away..

Image

Got some damage on me too ..

Image


..and here is the aftermath. Some Dumb ass with a machine gun doesn't seem to give a fuck(top left)(NPC's only take their weapons in hand when seen threat).

Image

edit1: there seems to bee a tile displacement in the roof too.

[Sandbox beta news]
If someone wants to actually play the sandbox beta, give me something it should include. Right now it includes Creating 4 different team mates as many as you (or your (if slow) computer) wishes. And gives all the weapons in the start. There is different types of enemies, enemy Tiger 1 tank, and Kubelwagen to drive (car physics with collisions suck, otherwise they are fine). I left out Flak cannon (usable by enemies and pl), and npc enemy attack plane.

Any info about the sandbox or the graphics is appreciated.

[sorry of my english and complexity, im very tired --> sleep]

Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

lembi2001



Registered
  01/04/2005
Points
  608

VIP MemberIt's-a me, Mario!Wii OwnerI like Aliens!Has Donated, Thank You!PS3 OwnerI am an April Fool
29th August, 2012 at 29/08/2012 18:21:35 -

Damn dude, this game looks impressive!!! I can't wait to get my hands on it.

 
n/a

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
30th August, 2012 at 30/08/2012 18:35:46 -

It's looking good! Those trains aren't moving, are they?

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
30th August, 2012 at 30/08/2012 20:12:43 -

No. But in my visions there is a mission where you have to sabotage the enemy fuel line [Blast the oil carriages from hide when they are moving] if you want an advantage in certain mission. I've planned that missions don't go like 1. 2. 3... but more like go where you want/need/ or have to go. It's all in my head still. Nothing's been decided.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
31st August, 2012 at 31/08/2012 19:53:08 -

I created a project page for a feedback-sandbox-beta:
http://create-games.com/project.asp?id=2349

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
1st September, 2012 at 01/09/2012 19:19:09 -

Finally figured out how they do those cool flamethrower effects.

Image

Oh it's missing the light effect. I added it.

Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

Jenswa

Possibly Insane

Registered
  26/08/2002
Points
  2722
1st September, 2012 at 01/09/2012 20:36:23 -

Nice flamethrower effect! Like the graphics also.

 
Image jenswa.neocities.org

Chris Donovan



Registered
  15/06/2003
Points
  448
2nd September, 2012 at 02/09/2012 20:26:17 -

Yeah, the flame looks really pro. Did you use 3 different layers of actives with transparency? That would take me days to make, and I'm not sure if I could make it that good. I'd like to see it animated.

 
Send me feedback on my latest game, It Never Ends.


http://www.misterdonovan.com/it-never-ends/info/

Pan-tosser



Registered
  24/10/2008
Points
  520

Has Donated, Thank You!
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 05:47:26 -

Your graphics style is indeed different and cool. Have you ever thought about writing an article explaining your methods and thought process.

The look is vary pulled together and professional looking. I would defently read the article if you wrote one.

 
https://www.facebook.com/nathon.brown.7

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 18:58:58 -


Originally Posted by Chris Donovan
Yeah, the flame looks really pro. Did you use 3 different layers of actives with transparency? That would take me days to make, and I'm not sure if I could make it that good. I'd like to see it animated.


I currently only have one layer in use. The flamer effect is done with this kind of active object that scales larger, rotates in cw or ccw, creates smoke, and has "add" effect.

Image


Here is version with the light effect:
edit: Ah fuck.. don't mind the lightness change in the ground in between player prone and the flames. The lighter ground there is a backdrop and a test area for the trees you see there.

Image

The player in prone is semitransparent since have not been seen.



Edited by hapsi

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 19:09:57 -


Originally Posted by Pan-tosser
Your graphics style is indeed different and cool. Have you ever thought about writing an article explaining your methods and thought process.

The look is vary pulled together and professional looking. I would defently read the article if you wrote one.



It would certainly be nice to write an article. I wish i didn't have to feed my family and use my time in work but i keep that in mind. Some of my methods you might find very weird and interesting. I.E. I can't actually draw very well(= i suck at drawing), but i think i can judge well.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 19:42:00 -


Originally Posted by Chris Donovan
The red brick in the second and third pictures. They look a little too round, and flat, I think. It almost looks like a strange floor pattern. It's supposed to be rubble from the wall? I get it. The round shape is too uniform for rubble. It works for explosions, but not rubble. Other than that, I have nothing else to say about the graphics. It looks good.



I think with your idea it does look better. Thanks.
Image

..and maybe do the same to the fallen metallic roof.

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 19:53:01 -

Image



 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
3rd September, 2012 at 03/09/2012 19:54:35 -

Maybe it's off some dust...

 
[Signature][/Signature]

hapsi



Registered
  13/11/2003
Points
  775
4th September, 2012 at 04/09/2012 18:38:32 -

Evolution of a tree: is the final realistic enough..?

Image



 
[Signature][/Signature]
   

Post Reply



 



Advertisement

Worth A Click