Once again I see this CIRCY fellow gave a game a 4. I can understand opinions, everyone has a right to their own, but even the opinion he gives does not equal a four, and the original graphics and, yes, the fact that it is a finished game should bring it up to at least a 6!
niether does your score alex <:p... seriously you people at the daily click need to set higher standards! you can with easy create snes-quality games with the click-products. not many seem to realize that. i see you giving 10's and 9's to games that at highest deserve a 5 or 6 in score :p. i'd give this game a 6 due to its quite original idea and gfx but not much more.. its a nice game but nothing out of the ordinary. also the scrolling is a nice touch, but its still just a little playing with the X coordinate.
Yeah I was generous but when it looks to me like a lot of effort was put into a game and I enjoy playing the game a lot, then to me it is a 10. Games shouldn't be rated on how much like an SNES game they are or anything.
Actually, my review was based on my first impressions of the game...and if I could edit my review then I would; I didnt fully realise you had to get all the animals in the slot machine to increase your health, and I didnt realise it could scroll. So Ill increase the rating one notch to a 5. Happy?
I agree with the snes thing if the games on daily click were mostly 30-40mb files I would'nt even come here although I love SNES games and would like to see them in production again not all this new crap were gettin althogh I do like some new titles.
Thats why I come to daily click cos o dat snes feeling.