As much as it pains me to say this, while many of his posts may have been rather aggrevating and perhaps childish those posts were part of TDC - you must realize that the more resistant you are to his posts the more he's going to repeatedly join. Just try letting him rejoin, and don't ban him for a while; if he exhibits "traditional phizzy behaviour" temporarily tolerate it as a small test.
That was, notably, a slightly edited copypasta from another forum with minor words changed.
Originally Posted by Bibin As much as it pains me to say this, while many of his posts may have been rather aggrevating and perhaps childish those posts were part of TDC - you must realize that the more resistant you are to his posts the more he's going to repeatedly join. Just try letting him rejoin, and don't ban him for a while; if he exhibits "traditional phizzy behaviour" temporarily tolerate it as a small test.
Ugh, do you know how many times he's done that? I've probably asked the admins not to ban him about 4 times already a few years back, then I just thought "fuck it", ban him for a month. And he comes back and 2 weeks later he STILL does the same thing. And we banned him and unbanned him again, and he STILL does it. Now he's at the point where some admins think that weapons of mass destruction should be launched on him on sight. If he would just stop being a jerk, there'd be no reason to ban him. But as soon as he comes on here, he starts flaming Adam, apparently posted something in the Digital Works section, and within half an hour after he appeared, a few alerts popped up about how he should be dealt with.
Besides, he said that he's leaving TDC anyway, so just let him leave.
I quite like him, still keep many of his tutorials, learned stuff from him, and he's also a DC donator, but that doesn't mean that he has the right to act the way he does. His name has become synonymous with how people shouldn't act. Even if there were no rules, he'd still get banned for acting like he did.
Disclaimer: Any sarcasm in my posts will not be mentioned as that would ruin the purpose. It is assumed that the reader is intelligent enough to tell the difference between what is sarcasm and what is not.
Originally Posted by Bibin As much as it pains me to say this, while many of his posts may have been rather aggrevating and perhaps childish those posts were part of TDC - you must realize that the more resistant you are to his posts the more he's going to repeatedly join. Just try letting him rejoin, and don't ban him for a while; if he exhibits "traditional phizzy behaviour" temporarily tolerate it as a small test.
Ugh, do you know how many times he's done that? I've probably asked the admins not to ban him about 4 times already a few years back, then I just thought "fuck it", ban him for a month. And he comes back and 2 weeks later he STILL does the same thing. And we banned him and unbanned him again, and he STILL does it. Now he's at the point where some admins think that weapons of mass destruction should be launched on him on sight. If he would just stop being a jerk, there'd be no reason to ban him. But as soon as he comes on here, he starts flaming Adam, apparently posted something in the Digital Works section, and within half an hour after he appeared, a few alerts popped up about how he should be dealt with.
Besides, he said that he's leaving TDC anyway, so just let him leave.
I quite like him, still keep many of his tutorials, learned stuff from him, and he's also a DC donator, but that doesn't mean that he has the right to act the way he does. His name has become synonymous with how people shouldn't act. Even if there were no rules, he'd still get banned for acting like he did.
Well, the idea was that he'd hopefully halt some of this ridiculous behavior; given his record though I've lost faith in that possibility too.
Advertisement
Post Reply
Edited by the Author.
