Originally Posted by -Adam- Im targetting you? Even though you blatantly just took offense to a perfectly reasonable observation regarding a DVD cover that you didn't even post? Ironically everything you just took your afternoon typing describes yourself. Oh, and calling a Brit a punk is pretty much as the same as calling an American a wanker. It has little impact. Go figure.
I'd call you more, but I'm not going to let you get me banned. And you act like I take offense to every word you say, even if it's completely appropriate. I never took offense to what you said, I was merely showing you how silly what you said, sounded and how nonconstructive it was to the post - which if memory proceeds me, you seem to have an amount of respect for maintaining - meanwhile you're 9x out of 10, the only who derails it or purposely baits other people to derail it.
I'm not offended by you, that would give you too much credit. I'm putting you in your place. And for me to get DC messages from other members telling me they agree with me but didn't want to contribute in the dispute, that's saying something Adam. So I'll say it again, grow up.
But you're causing it yourself. You didn't have to make the snide remark after I commented on the DVD barcode, then try and turn it around out with crap about me targetting you.
And if we're getting back onto topic, your cover does look somewhat cheap. You over use photoshop bevels and glow effects in the title typography, making it look like a cheap movie ripoff, in combination with the chosen font. The font is also quite boring and looks like it should be on a Mother's day card rather than a fantasy film.
Most of the imagery that should be on the front is on the back, amongst the text boxes, which are bizarrely (in a non-stylistic way) outlined, the top looking one like it has been cut out to specifically to go around the barcode, as if that should be some kind of feature? I fail to see the need to seperate the text into two boxes in the first place. It almost looks like you didn't have enough content to fill it, so you shoved the images on the back, leaving a large gap to the left. Perhaps shots from the actual film or a landscape from the film would have been better suited.
Oh, and your logo doesn't resize well with the white outline, not against the background at any rate.
Advertisement
Post Reply
Edited by Silveraura
