http://www.sigbars.com/
Theres a long list of tags, select all that apply & help everyone get to know you just a little bit better.
Those are all the ones that apply to me.
I dislike those things. On a forum I visit almost everyone decided they needed a dozen of them sigged, which lasted till the userbar server went down. That gave everyone time to realise how much nobody really cares.
Thats why forum creators take the time to add image limits into there sigs or char. limits into the sigs, that way people wont fill them up & annoy the hell out of people who dont care.
sorry about the space thing, but it wont let me edit the post now :-/
n/a
Pete Nattress Cheesy Bits img src/uploads/sccheesegif
Registered 23/09/2002
Points 4811
26th January, 2006 at 16:22:57 -
These things annoy me so much. "Google User", do these people want a sodding medal? Who doesn't use Google? Windows Media Player? I'm so impressed that you manage to use the default media player installed on Windows. Give yourself a stupid forum tag! Notepad user? GOD.
They mean notepad as apposed to like ConTEXT or other script editors, & Google as apposed to say Yahoo, Windows Media Player rather then like WinAMP or iTunes, Windows as apposed to Mac or Linux.
... or else
... and proud of it
... not proud of that
... all the way
... well, i'm thinking about buying it
... and lovin' it
... it's just what came with my computer
... to the bone
... Pepsi SUCKS
... yup, that's right
I'm also a:
iTunes user
iPod Shuffle User
DS User
Mario Kart DS Player
Podcast Addict
Computer Geek
PC Gamer
MMF USER
ect...
I know I've said this before, but Windows kicks Mac OS's ass, and know I really know about the subject having to use the goddamn Apple Mac's all the time. Everything has to be in it's own little windows, which you can't find easily like in Windows.
As for the sigbox's - they're poo. Not a patch on the Wikipedia userboxes. If anyone's interested there's Klik userbox - just put {{User Klik}} onto your userpage.
WindowsXP never crashes unless you caught a virus (which is rare, expecially if your not on websites your not suppost to be on #1... #2, if you have a good virus scanner), it just goes very slowly if your screwed something up. You can press WindowsXP as hard as you can, an it will run slowly, but you'll never get a blue screen or anything like that. WindowsXP was the dawn of the true working Windows. I'm not going to any other OS, expecially if WindowsVista is planned to be even better then WindowsXP! So screw Mac!
As far as I am concerned, if it doesn’t happen on 2 different computers with the same system specs, then its not Window's fault, its the persons fault for putting something on it that made it unstable. WindowsXP in general is a perfectly fine OS, it’s not fair for people to blame Windows, because they enjoy screwing things up, just because they can. Windows is very flexible, so before you go screwing with things, make sure you know what the hell you’re doing first. It will let you mess it up, Mac wont... that’s the problem most people seem to have. I rest my case.
In my experience, Mac crashes more than Windows. I can't remember one single crash on my XP computer, even running loads of games, software programs and the like. Mac's mess up at the slightest little thing. They have no redeeming features.
DaVince This fool just HAD to have a custom rating
Registered 04/09/2004
Points 7998
4th February, 2006 at 13:33:52 -
I have no experience with macs, but I do have experience with Linux.
The funny thing is: when a Windows program crashes, it's caused more often by Windows than the program, and Windows crashes half too. When a Linux program crashes, it's often the program's own fault, not Linux's, and Linux just keeps on running correctly.
But then again, Linux has a whole community working on it, so yeah, it's pretty logical it's more stable than Windows.
About those bars: meh. Signatures are used for your little comment under every post of yours, maybe a link too, and MAYBE a banner, but nothing more.
If you fail, try try again... You'll get it in the end
Deleted User
20th February, 2006 at 14:43:14 -
i'm a - it's good for movies, sux for games
i'm a and i make great gfx
you should because Bill gates sux and IE is buggy
i'm a that make MMF exts
i have to be a because most of programs are win only
i'm a great that makes amazing dynamic websites
i'm a and i also like google
i'm a because the exts SDKs are for it
i'm aand i'm proud
i'm a and i like it
i'm aand watch the anime channel
i'm also
Windows isn't as bad as people say. Most people who hate Windows really haven't tried any of the other operating systems. The people who go all "Windoze sux00rs! My O/S RulZ!" are complete idiots, even if they do have the technical expertise to make a sub-standard DOS clone. XP is slow, looks like cheap plastic, and damn expensive, but it works. I just hate MS for their monopolistic ways. Inventing Windows is like inventing the UN... everyone has to use it to survive, but it's almost immoral to charge such a high price on it.
Mac sux though. They're stable and fast and all, but overall, the prices and the fanatical uber-nerds who use it make me too embarrassed to touch them.
Disclaimer: Any sarcasm in my posts will not be mentioned as that would ruin the purpose. It is assumed that the reader is intelligent enough to tell the difference between what is sarcasm and what is not.
The only reason Max is stable is because it’s not nearly as flexible as Windows, how ever this is where Windows becomes an OS that most people don’t want to use. Windows is very easy to screw up, because it’s so easy to customize it. Windows itself is not a slow OS, it’s when people screw it up, or don’t have a good processor, like AMD 64, or any kind of duel. WindowsXP's system requirements go extremely low before it stops functioning correctly, my sisters Pentium 2 (Yes I know...) runs WindowsXP (without all the visual looks) perfectly, actually better then the Windows 98SE did. How ever, just because the system requirements to get it working fine are low, doesn’t mean that the recommended are too. Allot of people recommend at least a Pentium 4 with 512MB of ram, I use it on Athlon 64 with 1GB of ram & I haven’t had 1 problem.
Advertisement
Post Reply
Edited by the Author.
... or else
... not proud of that
... all the way
... well, i'm thinking about buying it
... and lovin' it
... it's just what came with my computer
... to the bone
... Pepsi SUCKS
... yup, that's right
- it's good for movies, sux for games
and i make great gfx
because Bill gates sux and IE is buggy
that make MMF exts
because most of programs are win only
that makes amazing dynamic websites
and i also like google
because the exts SDKs are for it
and i'm proud
and i like it
and watch the anime channel
