Closed minded? You’re part of the closed mined 2% group of retards stuck on the flaming ship. And I said stop bitching about repeating stuff, its not like you say anything worth anyone’s time. I don’t give a fuck if you repeat your bullshit, I read it, and countered it. Once I shoot down your argument doesn't mean for you to repeat yourself. Just because you buy shitty beige PCs is no reason to call them ugly. I have already shown that PC's are stronger per dollar spent, end of story, you just can’t weasel out of facts. And if assembling computers makes you an expert, then I have been raising geniuses at the kindergarten I volunteer at. These 6 year olds can install ram and set up the BIOS, so I'm not impressed if you can.
I hope you have a long rest, it must have been a strain on your brain to type so many hard words.
Steve Zissou: Anne-Marie, do all the interns get Glocks?
speaking about facts, and new machines (new XP/2000 packs and OS 10.4) i heard, and seen a few times that Windows based PC servers DO crash more. hell if the company who installed the networks at Manchester Airport and Liverpools John Lennon Airport chose apple servers over PCs for the bohemoth systems... well dosnt that say anything in terms of stability? reliability? but i suppose they're wrong too arnt they?
"And if assembling computers makes you an expert"
no, but a year at Xenon does
look, it wasnt long ago that you said passive smoking isnt that bad for you just relax ok?
buying a 30" flat panel is waste of money, monitors in a few years will be paper thin, support really really really massive resolutions and wont be based on ancient technology.
No, sorry, you didn't: "For a dual 3.4 P4 with a gig of ram, 500gb RAID 0 dual mirrordrives, cdrw dvd/rw usb 2.0 firewire, media card slots, it costs $1509, which is $1361 less than your machine, has a DVD burner, has 420GB more space, and has a better graphics card. Your machine only has dual 1 GHZ (the $2,870) compared to the dual 3.4's. Now if you want to compare it to the latest G5, they still only have 2.5 and 512mg ram... The number you were referring to is including the price of an LCD projector, and a 7GB ram upgrade.
SO: "A PC IS BETTER PER DOLLAR SPENT."
and stop the winking, it's really creeping me out.
Steve Zissou: Anne-Marie, do all the interns get Glocks?
you do not pay attention, do you JP? the ~$3k one is the dual 2.5 ghz, in fact, apple doesn't sell a dual 1 ghz to my knowledge. This is a losing battle your fighting JP. Even my friend who absolutely hates macs wants this computer
As a boy, I wanted to be a train. I didn’t realize this was unusual—that other kids played with trains, not as them.
Theres your $2870 one idiot, and I provided the information for both, the 2.5 and 1GHz and took in to account both prices, and if you can fucking subtract PC still comes out better. I am not losing any battle, your just to stupid raise the white flag. For a human, you're pretty stupid. why do you keep attacking my attention, when you skip over shit like a schoolgirl playing hopskotch. I accounted for both.
Steve Zissou: Anne-Marie, do all the interns get Glocks?
I have to agree with jp on this one. Pc's are way better for your money. Plus, who likes the mac setup. I hate having to click the apple for what I want. I like the start menu better.
I'm totally with JP on this one, probably because I use my pc as a gaming machine, and when it comes to games macs can't do jack all. The latest pc titles are graphically so far ahead of everything else in the industry at the moment. There much hope for gaming with a mac because it lacks direct x.
I recently build my pc (a 3200+ amd64/1 gb 400mhz ram/gforce 6800) for just under 700 quid- I know some really expensive macs have loads of power and everyhting (minus the good gfx card) but its of absolutely no use to me if you can't play anything on it!
Wait, practically any machine can run Linux, except palmtops. And laptops, but what kind of serious nerd, er, user has a laptop? Anyway, more computers can run Linux then can run Windows IMO.